Uncertainty & How We Believe

Recently, during one of our evening DTS times, all the guys from the school were sitting around and began to casually discuss theology. Before long, as is all too common, we were in the midst of a very intense, heated discussion. I won’t get into the topic, but an interesting pattern emerged. When I would challenge conventional interpretations of Scripture, I was met with the expected and heated defense of traditions views, followed by the assertion that the Bible is abundantly clear.
Baiting them (yes, I confess), I then began to ask very difficult questions challenging them to reconcile seemingly impossible beliefs about God’s characters with His actions in Scripture. Without fail, the response was a quick reply that God’s ways are not our ways; we are limited, finite beings; there are some things that we can’t possibly hope to fully understand.
The emerging church often gets slammed with the critique that we are relativists who deny absolute truth. We are said to recklessly embrace uncertainty when God and His (written) Word offers us clear, propositional truths. Besides the fact that very few emerging Christians or communities are such hard postmodernists (I have not connected with any personally), and besides the fact that a great majority of emerging Christians/communities (again, as far as I’ve explored) not only believe in absolute truth and even the use of propositional ideas of truth (albeit with a distinct and often over-stated “chastened certainty”, to borrow a term I learned from Scot McKnight)- besides these things, I am not convinced that the established Evangelical church does not share this value when confronted with paradox or (apparent) contradiction.
In fairness, there are many who have invested their time and energy in order to find a systematic, doctrinal defence of all such scenarios. However, for many Christians, there seems to be a double standard in their response and confidence in their beliefs while allowing for uncertainty (in the guise of human limitation and the infinite nature of God), especially concerning those areas that contradict and/or threaten those areas which are embraced with absolute confidence.
With the issues we were discussing the other evening, while I have an idea of where I stand, I recognize that I could very likely be way off. My greatest concern for the students who were defending their position was, not that they were necessarily believing the wrong thing, but that they were believing in a wrong way (Peter Rollins excellent book develops this better than I can, so go buy “How (Not) To Speak Of God”). Believing the right thing for the wrong reason or in the wrong way can seriously impact negatively the way we relate to God, each other, ourselves, Creation and the world.
For example, if we allow the fallen nature of sinful humanity to be the primary reference point for reflecting on our relationship to God, we frame faith in fear, condemnation and despair. Is the belief wrong? I don’t think so, but the extreme over-emphasis or making it be the first and foundational place to define God and faith, leads us away from God’s intention. We are created in the image of God, but that image has been broken, marred or scarred by sin. However, we are defined by that scar. In fact, the scar only has meaning as a negative because of the image it has impacted.
This conversation inspired me to examine my own beliefs and assumptions, and those held by the community which I am a part of, to consider if I am believing the right things for the wrong reasons. Perhaps I am believing the wrong things for the right reasons or the simply the wrong things altogether. In the end, it is most important that we have the humility to always be questioning ourselves and our ideas about God.
In an attempt to be faithful, we can end up making idols out of our beliefs. When we discover that God is not measuring our beliefs against His perfection, searching for errors, but rather looks to our hearts, correcting with grace and conviction, not fear and condemnation. How can we treat each other (or ourselves) any differently?
