What Is Organic Missionality?
During the Allelon evnet last week, one of the questions asked of Alan Roxburgh was about the difference between “organic” and “institutional” expressions of church or missionality. Alan quickly dismissed the distinction as a false dichotomy, stating that we have too quickly branded institutions as “bad”. While I think he missed the heart of what the question was asking (What say you, Greg?), Alan made some excellent points.
Many others were stirred by this portion of the conversation. My friend Paul, from the local Watershed community, had this to say:
A question I am left with after listening to the conversation involves Alan’s response to someone who was attempting to distinguish between “organicly directed” mission and “institutionally directed mission. Again the inadequacy of language rears it head – what I took as the question was how I move from “Spirit” determined expansion of the Kingdom rather than “strategic” self constructed marketing geared at conversion.
The answer that Alan suggested through his talk, but not necessarily in response to the questioner, was that as we share as individuals in faithful community we allow the Spirit to be a Go-Between ourselves and others in such a way as to lead to the awareness of Christ’s presence. Incidently this is not a conceptual process but an incarnational and spiritual one.
Alan’s direct answer to the questioner, overemphasized the definition of organic and institutional. Of course both aspects are in every situation and the Kingdom’s wind blows in Emergent and Missional and traditional settings but the deep conversation is definitely impeded by humanly constructed restrictions on how the Spirit operates. Hopefully more on this and other topics as the dialogue moves on.
I think Paul was perceptive in noting that language and definitions were impeding the actual question. While I agreed with what Alan shared- for I think we are taking a great risk in dismissing all forms of institution is respect to the church- I wish he had explored the issue more thoroughly. (Ironically, I think Alan got caught up in defintions shortly after he made it clear than such definitions are not very helfpul). Where I agreed with Alan was that we should not view the church in such binary terms- be it organic vs. institutional, emerging vs. traditional, etc. We have much to learn from each without limiting our understanding so narrowly.
That being said, I do believe there are significant implications in the distinction between organic and mechanistic worldviews, especially in how they inform our ecclessiology and missiology. While I won’t go into detail here, I believe the impact of the Industrial Revolution on the way we view and relate to the world around us has been significant and damaging. Our understanding of community, missionality, Scripture and even God drastically shift if we can relearn the more organic worldview into which we were created.
What do you think?


