Several years ago, while attending a Biblical training school with YWAM, I read through the entire Bible in just over two months. As I reached some of the Old Testament geneaologies, I was tempted to skim. However, rather than take the easy way out, I read every line, then spent some time waiting on God in prayer for understanding. Frankly, I didn’t expect much, which is why I was surprised that it turned into one of the more important lessons of my faith journey.
Consider Exodus 3, as Moses approaches the burning bush. Here we have a classic and powerful example of God revealing Himself in power. He begins by calling Moses by name, then commands him to take off his sandals, as he was standing on holy ground. It is here that God identifies Himself:
He said also, “I am the God of your father, the God of Abraham, the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob ” Then Moses hid his face, for he was afraid to look at God.”
-Exodus 3:6 (NASB)
In one of the most dramatic and powerful displays of His presence that we find in Scripture, in a moment of calling one the most important leaders in history into his missional vocation, God chooses to identify Himself by the relationships He had established throughout generations before. Of course, it is an affirmation of the continuity of the covenant God made with Abraham. However, I think there is more to it than that. Here are a few things I’ve learned:
First, God identifies first with being the God of Moses’ father. After revealing Himself in power, inviting Moses into His holy presence, He identifies with Moses’ father, Amram (which means “friend of the most high God”). While never diminishing His holiness, His power and His authority, God identifies with us very personally. We should never forget that the very foundation of human value, the seed bed of human rights and the healthy celebration of individuality were are all born out of the richness of the Judeo-Christian tradition. God values each of us. (Note: For more on this topic, I highly recommend Thomas Cahill’s “The Gifts Of The Jews”).
Second, He identifies with Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, the patriarchs of Judaism, of the great faith. As I already said, this reflects a foundation in His covenant with His people. More than this, however, is revealed that God related to each of these men as representatives of their people in their time. He related to them as men representing very specific and unique generations and circumstances. God, while being holy and eternal, and while relating to us where we are today, does not forget (nor does He want us to forget) the very unique relationship He had with those who have come before. He values them, recognizing that which each generation brings to the great narrative.
Third, God neither ignores nor tolerates the failures of each generation, but rather, while He clearly brings punishment when needed, He does not dissolve the covenantal relationship. His commitment to His people is as constant as His love. Even in the face of great judgment, such as exile in a pagan land, God makes way for His people to return to His purposes for them, as well as to relationship with Him. Each generation is intentionally made aware of the failures of previous generations as reminders not only of the consequences for disobedience, but also about God’s unfailing grace.
So what can we learn from these lessons? More specifically, what does this say to those of us involved in the emerging/missional church movement?
First, in an age where individualism has so rampantly swept through our culture (the church culture included), leaving a wake of devastating consequences, we must be so intentional and cautious not to swing to an opposite extreme. While we need to rediscover our shared identity as a missional community, now more than ever, we must never underplay the significance of a God who deems individuals worthy of not only relating to us, but identifying Himself in terms of that relationship.
Second, we must remember that as we seek to follow God, we must recognize that He chooses to relate to us uniquely as a people in a specific time and place in history. This is a significant aspect of what the emerging/missional movement is all about. However, we cannot forget that, as true as this point is for us, it also stands true for previous generations. Whether we are referring to the Medieval or the Modern expression, God was (and is) in active, covenantal relationship with them. As we relate to those from different traditions and expressions of the faith, we must do so as God does, with grace and love.
Third, without question each of these expressions are fraught with failures (as is and will be the emergent/missional/postmodern expressions), but this does not dissolve the eternal connection between God and His people. Each generation brings unique dynamics to the people of God- some are specific to their era, while others are universal that following generations would do well to respect. The emerging church conversation has in fair part been made up of a critique of the negative impact of an uncitical embrace of aspects of modernity, etc. No matter how valid these concerns may be (and I believe they are VERY valid), we cannot forget or diminish that, if God is the God of both the established and emerging church, then we are inexplicably connected- one Body, one Church.
I would love to hear your thoughts. What do those of you who identify with the emerging church most appreciate about the established church? And what do those of you who identify with the established church most appreciate about the emerging church?
Emerging Church, Missional