Monday, January 30, 2006

Blog Swarm By The People, For The People

As I am fairly new to the blogosphere, I am still learning so much about what is involved in this revolutionary new medium. Additionally, I also jumped into the whole “emerging church” aka “church that is emerging”, which thrust me into the deep end fairly early on. The intensity and rapid growth of the emerging church conversation online, especially through blogs, tells us a great deal. In his recent book “Blog: Understanding the Information Reformation That’s Changing Your World”, Hugh Hewitt said:

“When many blogs pick up a theme or begin to follow a story, a blog swarm forms. A blog swarm is an early indicator of an opinion storm brewing, which, when it breaks, will fundamentaly alter the general public’s understanding of a person, place, product or phenomenon.” (pg. 1, Nelson Books, 2005)

This certainly describes the reality of the emerging church corner of the blogosphere, not to mention those line up to counter or condemn it. That being said, those of us adding our voice to this dialogue and debate must do so effectively and wisely, something I have been seeking to do. I have been considering how I might change my blog in order to most effectively and properly engage the topic(s).

To that end, I put these questions to you, my readers, in regards to the nature and content of this blog:

  • What changes could I make to this blog to improve the quality and focus of the content?
  • What issues/questions would you like to see addressed and explored here?
  • What have not liked or found unhelpful at this blog in the part?

Generally, this is an open invitation for you, the readers, the shape the next stage in my blogging journey. Please feel free to be completely frank and honest with me. I look forward to hearing from you all.

Posted by Jamie Arpin-Ricci in 19:56:22 | Permalink | Comments (31)

Friday, January 27, 2006

Report on Rendezvous at the King’s Head

On Tuesday evening, I enjoyed what is quickly becoming one of my favourite monthly events- The Rendezvous a.k.a. Kindling Point a.k.a. Theology Pub Night- over at the King’s Head Pub here in Winnipeg. After a break over the December holidays, it was really good to get back in the rountine. As I am not one to reinvent the wheel, here is Brother Maynard‘s excellent retelling of the evenings events:

A group of us met earlier this week at the legendary King’s Head Pub in Winnipeg’s Exchange District. Having set the meeting time as “Tuesday evening, sharp,” Jamie Arpin-Ricci and I sat down early to get some food beforehand, but decided to move upstairs in search of slightly quieter environs. Having just gotten started on a couple orders of ribs, we found ourselves overrun by some type of drawing or planning event for The Winnipeg Fringe Festival which drove us into the new upper room, where we settled down for the evening.

This provided an excellent venue for discussion, but left us a little concerned that people wouldn’t find us as easily. I left word with the staff on the main floor so they’d know where to send anyone looking for the “Theology Pub” …in response to the odd look the fellow gave me, I held out my hands, palms open and said, “The two do go together!” to which he replied, “Hand in hand.” In any event, when The Old Bill showed up, they simply motioned him upstairs without him having to say who he was looking for. We just aren’t sure what that means.

Our gathering consisted of one pastor, the aforementioned bloggers, a couple of people from the publishing industry, and a couple of denominational “representatives.” Quite a mix, which made for excellent discussion on a variety of topics, including our notes from the recent Leonard Sweet conference and a wide array of other topics as they struck us from a variety of sources including recent blogs. We also touched on Emergent.ca and other related matters.

Lots more to be said, and will be said. There is general interest in making our periodic gatherings into something a little more formal, which means mostly that there will be more than two days’ notice of a get-together following a sudden decision to hold one. It’s rather anticipated that this will reduce the number of people who respond with variations of “Great, keep me in the loop and let me know when the next one is, since I can’t make this one” and should serve to increase the actual attendance, since people will have enough warning to plan to show up. Interest is actually fairly wide-spread… it’ll also mean they should end up being not quite so far apart. A direct email will be going out shortly in this regard to people who have expressed interest already.

Posted by Jamie Arpin-Ricci in 15:42:56 | Permalink | Comments (5)

Thursday, January 26, 2006

‘The Book of Daniel’ Cancelled by NBC

After only four episodes, NBC has cancelled their controversial new show “The Book of Daniel”, the debut of which I reviewed recently. The quickly waning number of viewers to a disappointing low is creditted for the decision by the network to forever shut “The Book of Daniel”, but the American Family Association (AFA) is taking credit for this “victory”.

While I hope the show was cancelled for it complete lack of quality writing (which I still suspect is the case), I certainly hope it was not because of the AFA and other Christian groups calling for boycotts and protests. The last thing Christians need to be identifying with is reactionary fundamentalism that prides itself at bullying society to our narrow view of “morality” that has little to do with the heart of our faith. (See In Defence of Freedom)

At this point, NBC has not plans to air the remaining episodes, though I suspect they could make a killing on the DVD’s. You heard it here first!

Posted by Jamie Arpin-Ricci in 20:48:29 | Permalink | Comments (11)

Tuesday, January 24, 2006

Uganda & the Evil of Kony

Over the last year I have been following the horrific evil that is going on in northern Uganda and the Sudan, what the UN calls “one of the worst human-rights crises of the past century.” Children are being forced to murder and rape in the name of supposed freedom, forced by a megamonical leader with a messiah complex. So little is being done. Those who are acting are doing so with little support and at great risk. We dropped the ball with Rwanda, to our own shame. Let’s not repeat the same mistake.

PLEASE READ the following article for a good overview:

If you would like more information about how you can get involved, please do not hesitate to contact me. I have already begun dialogue with several agencies about organizing some serious action. I’ll be making a call for your help soon. Also, please see the following links for more information.

This is not something that we can ignore:

Brutality Therapy: Love and art are keys to healing.
Gulu Walk: A great way Canadians have started stepping out in response to this tragedy.
Peace Not out of Reach: What American Christians can do to help resolve the LRA conflict.
Profile of LRA: The BBC report on the LRA is a good introduction to the rebels
World Vision in Uganda: Check out their important work that need your support.
Invisible Children: A powerful new documentary made by three very committed young guys.  See the trailer here.

Posted by Jamie Arpin-Ricci in 21:05:50 | Permalink | Comments (13)

Monday, January 23, 2006

Election Day in Canada

Today is Canada’s 39th General Election. If you are Canadian, be sure to get to your local voting stations and place your vote. I don’t want to hear any excuses, rationalizations or rebuttals. Regardless of how you feel about the process, the candidates or the country, we have a responsibility to participate. We enjoy so many benefit with so little required of us, if you are able to get there, you should have no other excuse. Vote.

If you are NOT Canadian, please be taking the time to pray for our country, our citizens and our government. Also pray that, as Christians here participate in this important process, wethey will also recognize our responsibilities to build His greater Kingdom, regardless of the results of this election.

Peace be with you.

Posted by Jamie Arpin-Ricci in 07:10:00 | Permalink | Comments (8)

Saturday, January 21, 2006

Rendezvous / Kindling Point, Tues. Jan. 24th

Another Rendezvous night here in Winnipeg coming up. As Bro Maynard said it better than I could, here it is:

Tuesday, January 24th @ the King’s Head Pub in Winnipeg (7/8pm-ish), anyone interested in emerging church issues and wanting to connect for a brew is welcome to join us. We may be discussing the Summoned to Lead conference this past week with Leonard Sweet, or we may still be discussing the future of the inherited church. Or we may be discussing something else altogether, like the election results of the night before. Or not… come and see.

I think there will be a lot of good stuff on topic, including the survey results from Emergent.ca, the future of our monthly gatherings and moving towards a cohesive regional expression. Look forward to seeing you there!

Posted by Jamie Arpin-Ricci in 17:35:52 | Permalink | Comments (4)

Friday, January 20, 2006

Random Links of Interest

Inspired by Jordon & Wendy Cooper, I have decided to try fill in my quiet blog days with some links of interest that I came across in the course of the week. Here are a few that have caught my eye and interest:

-African Jesus of the Silverscreen: Being touted as the worlds first black Jesus movie, this entry at the Sundance Film Festival presents the life of Christ set in modern day Africa. Intentionally trying to bring the political realities of Jesus life into focus, the film is sure to stir a lot of interest.

-Remembering Dorothy Day: For anyone not familiar with this incredible woman, a personal hero and inspiration in my life, this is a good starting point. For further info, read the Wikipedia entry and consider “The Long Loneliness”, where Day tells her own story.

-Justice Is Reconciliation: From another life hero, Desmond Tutu explores the need for us to embrace “restorative justice”, demonstrating that justice and the ministry of reconciliation given to us by God are not at odds.

-Will Jesus Christ Please Take The Stand: Italian priest, Padre Enrico Righi, has been named in a lawsuit for making horribly fraudulent claims- That Jesus, in fact, did exist. And where did he make such a claim? The parish church bulletin. The nerve, eh?

Enjoy!

Posted by Jamie Arpin-Ricci in 23:24:40 | Permalink | Comments (2)

Thursday, January 19, 2006

On Emerging in Canada

For the last two days I attended the “Summon To Lead” conference hosted by the PAOC with Leonard Sweet as the keynote speaker.  This afternoon, there was a panel discussion, which included Leonard Sweet, the infamous Brother Maynard (a self-described “ecclesiological vagrant”), Pastor Gerry Michalski and myself.  It was a great conversation, part of an even better conference.  One of the questions that was of particular interest to me was on how the emerging church in Canada might differ from the US.  Bro Maynard & I had been discussing Canada’s unique voice (or potential thereof), so I thought I would weigh in here.  (For those of you haven’t followed my blog for very long, I would encourage you to read my previous posts on the topic: Emergent Canada and More on Emergent Canada)

Much could be said on this topic (not to mention the inevitable difference of understanding from other Canadians), so understand that these are my own observations and should not be taken to represent any more than that.  Additionally, over the next week, I will go into more detail on some of the points that I introduce here.  The core issues where Canada does/could stand out are:

-Indigenous/First Nations Voice
-Cultural Mosaic
-Less Protest
-More Naturally Postmodern

Following these, I will explore the question of where we go from here.

-Indigenous/First Nations Voice:  During this weeks conference, Len Sweet stated that the “postmodern is more like the premodern than the modern”.  The resonance between emerging church theology & ecclesiology and that coming out  of the indigenous Christian communities and theologians is remarkable.  It is time that the paternalistic treatment of the indigenous people and begin to acknowledge our deep need for them.  This is not to say that there is not a significant voice from the First Nations people outside of Canada, but rather that Canada is better poised to embrace and support is aspect of emerging Christianity.

-Cultural Mosaic:  The idea  of a mosaic was developed in direct opposition to previous concepts of assimilation, such as the American concept of the melting pot. While the US concept has slowly broadened their understanding to be more multicultural, this concept is a key difference between these two nations. Cultural mosaic has a stronger emphasis on immigrant citizens maintain strong cultural and historical ties to their countries and cultures of origin. It is far more common, therefore, to hear Canadians refer to their cultural identities of their origin before they refer to being Canadian. This does not reflect a lack of patriotism to Canada, but rather is one of the truest expressions of Canadian patriotism. I believe that Canadian concepts of multiculturalism offer promising models for the emergent conversation in the United States. (*from my previous post, A Study In Contrast)

-Less Protest:  While there is still elements of protest within the emerging church in Canada, our experience differs, in part, because we are free of some of the influences so prominent in American Christianity, specifically Evangelicalism.  Because of the historical roots of religious nationalism in the US, linking political agendas (indiscriminately) with religious beliefs, the resulting polarization makes exploring emerging faith more sensitive, too often push both sides to unnecessary extremes.  Canada has a great degree of freedom to engage in dialogue with traditional or (what Len Sweet calls) the “inherited” church without the same degree of division and conflict.  (See more at my post Emerging Church & Nationalism)

-More Naturally Postmodern:  Out of a complex dynamic of cultural development, Canada has naturally developed as a postmodern & pluralistic society.  This has contributed, in part, to the statistical trend of the Canadian church shrinking.  However, as a result, the remaining churches have been pushed by necessity into relationship with each other, thus creating space for dialogue.  Combine this with other factors, including the lack of religious nationalism (and the resulting civil religion), and you have an environment well suited for the emerging dialogue.

Again, these are brief exploration of generalizations from my (limited) perspective.  However, I believe they represent some of the more important strengths that Canada (potentially) brings into the conversation.  However, all of this begs the question “Where do we go from here?”

I believe it is extremely important that those of us on the emerging journey here in Canada step out intentionally in this regards.  However, while I think this needs to happen sooner rather than later, I believe that part of that intentionality includes a bold, but cautious consideration of how that is done- a “tempered radicalism”, if you will.  We need to resist the impulse to over organize or formalize, especially given our national tendency to (intentionally or otherwise) mimic our good neighbours to the south, often lured by their “success”.

I imagine there will be very different perspectives as this unfolds, perhaps even a heated debate or two.  I am not convinced that would entirely unhealthy.  However, my hope is that wisdom (not just numbers) be the guiding influence as this plays itself out.  Look forward to more on this topic in the days to come.


Posted by Jamie Arpin-Ricci in 02:49:04 | Permalink | Comments (20)

Tuesday, January 17, 2006

Abortion: An Appeal

“For if we say that power is the ability to effect change, or the ability to achieve purpose, then it is not powerful to engage in an act that does not do that- no matter how loud are.”
- Martin Luther King Jr.

While Dr. King spoke these words to dissuade the increasing leanings of some of his followers towards violence, its wisdom speaks volume to the Church today as we seek to represent Christ and His Kingdom purposes.  So often, in the zeal of our own certainty and moral authority, we respond with a deep disregard for the violence of our words and attitudes.  Whether it is attacking an opposing theological belief or church practice, or denouncing cultural immorality, too often we undermine the authority as ambassadors of a loving God with our language, our tone, our unwillingness to even listen to others.

Perhaps one of the most promising trends in the emerging church is a change in this impulse, a willingness to ask the questions that otherwise would not be asked- not as a reflection of moral compromise, but rather as a genuine gesture of humility and honour to all involved.  My recent series of posts on homosexuality would not likely have been so well received by people on either side of the issue in years past.  As I said, it is a promising indicator of may yet be to come.

There is one topic that truly challenges not only the practice of this new approach, but questions its very appropriateness: abortion.  My own emotions rage when I consider the millions of lives lost daily to this practice.  I am unequivocal in my belief that abortion is wrong, representing one of the most distressing drifts of humanity away from God’s intentions for Creation.  Let that be clear from the very beginning.

However, I believe that Dr. King’s wisdom still needs to be heeded- perhaps more so, given the gravity of what is at stake where abortion is concerned.  Too often the intensity of our emotions and the certainty of our convictions can blind us to the impact our response can have in effecting real change.  While most of us understand the wrongness of extremists who use violence to stop abortion, too few of us recognize the very real violence of our language and attitude.

While I am not advocating pragmatism, we need to consider the true power (or lack thereof) of what often amounts to angry posturing in response to the world.  No matter how right we are, if our desire is to bring real change, then we must reconsider how we choose to engage our culture on this issue.  Is it so important  for us to be right that we would attempt to prove it at the expense of the lives lost?  Lost due to alienating the very people we seek to convince?  Because that is exactly what we do when we further polarize society with poorly considered attempts to convince them with sheer volume.

When we fail to acknowledge that we approach the issue with fundamentally different presuppositions, we fail to recognize that both sides perceive the other as something they are not- religious nuts on one side, blood thirsty murders on the other.  As long we continue in these terms, the issue will continue to fester, ripe for the exploitation of cunning politicians and manipulative fundamentalist (noting that neither politicians nor fundamentalist are always so inclined).

Consider, for example, how the issue is framed by those who support abortion: Pro-choice.  Rooting it at the heart women’s rights, abortion is no longer simply about the sanctity of life for them.  It is about taking back some of the power stolen from them throughout history by (often) abusively patriarchal cultures.  Sadly, the Church has far too often been complicit in this treatment of women.  Herein lies the problem: in our fierce refusal to hear the pro-choice argument, we simultaneously dismiss the issue of women’s rights.  No matter how disconnected our stance on the one is from the other, we cannot ignore that connection for them.

Additionally, regardless of how technically true it might be, throwing around words like “murder” and “genocide” is hardly likely to appeal to a persons willingness to consider.  Jesus had many opportunities to state absolute facts about the true nature of the sinners around Him, but He knew to whom He had been called.  He knew who needed Him the most.  He saved His clearest critiques for those who should have known better- the established religious community.

My appeal, then, is to consider how we might reframe our approach to bringing change on this significant issue (and so many others).  I am not suggesting that this task will not be difficult, never wanting to compromise.  However, let us rather demonstrate the power of Christ being working transformation into the hearts and lives of the nations through love, grace and service.  We have spent too long promoting and protecting a faith whose central tenant was being right.  Now is the time to manifest the “embracing grace” that extended to us while we were yet sinners.  The stakes are too high not to.



Posted by Jamie Arpin-Ricci in 06:21:51 | Permalink | Comments (35)

Saturday, January 14, 2006

In Defense of Oprah

Of late, I have taken some good natured ribbing at a few blogs for “coming out” as having a great deal of respect for Oprah Winfrey. After further exploring, it turns out that Oprah takes a fair share of hits from Christians online, the emerging variety being no exception. While I am not entirely surprised, I am somewhat disappointed by the (often) knee-jerk and shallow characterizations about Winfrey that are all too common. And so, after some coaxing I have decided to explain in detail why I like Oprah and why I think we all shouldn’t be so quick to judge or dismiss her.

Let me begin with a disclaimer. I am by no means advocating Oprah as an absolute model for all of us to follow. Nor am I trying to convince anyone that Oprah represents a Christian leader (too many people, either pro or con, try to envision Oprah as a pastor of some vast media church). I am uncomfortable with the emphasis on material wealth and “things” that are so central to the show(s), website and magazine. Her emphasis on forgiveness, while largely a positive feature, should not be equated with the forgiveness put forth by Christianity.

Oprah is by no means my central life hero, nor an icon for human perfection- nor would she ever claim anything of the sort. However, being as hugely popular as she is, it is too easy to make her a target. I do not understand the tendency for people to dislike something or someone simply because so many others like it or them, especially in the Church. I think there is much for us to respect of and learn from Oprah, the emerging church included. I will try to explore a few of the reasons here:

She Is Generous: As I have already said, I am uncomfortable with the materialism that seems to show up fairly frequently in Oprah’s mediums. That being said, I am largely comforted by her dedication to generosity. In addition to giving very generously out of her own pocket, especially to those who most need it, Oprah strong encourages her viewers to follow suit. She even makes giving easy, exciting and part of a communal experience. Further, she also challenges people to get involved personally. What is especially admirable, given the oft tendency to for American’s not to look beyond their borders, Oprah directs her generosity (and that of her viewers) both locally and globally. When most Christians give less than 2% of their income, we could take a lesson.

She Is An African American Woman: As the emerging church claims to be a more embracing community (or at least working towards it), we should be careful not to dismiss the powerful voice of Oprah Winfrey. As an African American, she has shattered assumptions, expectations and stereotypes, both overt and subtle, that our highly racialized, white culture still holds, made only that much more powerful by the fact that she is a woman. We would be wise to recognize that Oprah has the ear of tens of thousands of women, many who listen to her with unprecedented trust and loyalty. There is something in what she is saying & doing (and how she is saying & doing it) that we (the Church) would do well to consider if we hope to bridge this gap- a gap, consequently, that we are largely responsible for creating.

She Creates Community: An uncanny gift that Oprah seems to wield is her ability to make her viewers & readers feel part of something bigger. Having followed the show fairly frequently over the years, I cannot help but notice how I feel present when watching, both with Oprah and with the mass of other viewers around the world. This is further deepened by the unrivaled virtual community created through her website, which is not only a way for viewers to connect with each other, but also a treasure chest of resources that any church would envy. (Her book club is also an aspect of this community experience, but I will comment on that at the end of this post).

She Is Real: In a culture that glamourizes our stars and heroes to the point of absurdity, Oprah has been remarkably open with her own human nature. Whether it is her struggle with weight or her history of abuse and rape, she pulls back the curtain, exposing a real person. Certainly she is glamourous and no doubt a celebrity, Oprah breaks stereotypes by rooting her life experience right alongside all of ours. Even in her programming, Oprah openly acknowledges (and chastises herself for) her own mistakes in using peoples misery for sensationalism (which she has, arguably, only done once).

She Is An Agent Of Change: Some time ago, I heard a Canadian journalist/activist, who has dedicated her life to fighting AIDS in Africa, tell of meeting Oprah in Africa on one her trips there. She cynically dismissed Oprah’s “promise” to make the world aware of this 20 year problem turned pandemic. However, on returning to North America, this reporter had to swallow her words when she encountered the number of people (especially women) who were not only aware, but actively involved in the cause. This is just one example.

Perhaps most admirable is how she has brought issues, such as sexual abuse, out of the shadows and into the lives and living rooms of millions. While her own experiences obviously bias her perspective, she has given voice to such important concepts as restorative justice (a concept deeply Christian, yet widely unknown or misused in the Church). Her recent push to catch America’s most wanted child predators quickly resulted in three arrests, one caught in Belize and another in Costa Rica by local viewers. While silent about her own political affiliation, she has challenged millions to better awareness and involvement, increasing voters in demographs most noted for low turn out. And this just brushes the surface.

Again, I am not trying to convince anyone that we should all be card-carrying Oprah-phites, daily viewers, magazine subscribers and Book Club enthusiasts. Nor am I suggesting (and neither is Oprah) that she should viewed as a “Christian Leader” (though Christianity plays unveiled place of strong influence in her life). While not enough to disqualify them at all, there are even flaws that we could explore, many within the very points I have raised above. She is human, after all.

However, given the unending stream of utter drivel, blasphemous garbage and politically prostituted programming, we could do much worse than the kind of product (and let’s be clear here, it IS a product) Oprah produces. I am completely convinced that television (and even the world, on some levels) would be worse off in the absence of Oprah. In looking for role models in popular culture, we could do far worse than a woman deeply respected by people such as Desmond Tutu, Nelson Mandela and Rosa Parks. In the end, I think it behooves us to pursue a more embracing attitude toward this woman who has risen from a tragic history (to which she credits God) to become one of the most powerful and influential forces for good in popular culture.

____________________



Postscript: With the recent scandal surrounding James Frey & his “memoirs”, an Oprah Book Club selection, much attention has been paid to critiquing the quality Oprah’s golden touch on all her book club selections. While I wonder at her quick defense of Frey, she can hardly be faulted for his mistake or the publishers failure to demand integrity. However, the doors of criticism are again wide open. Many are digging up author John Franzen’s discomfort with his book, “The Corrections” being chosen by Oprah, worried that it would cast along side some of the former selections, which he called schmaltzy and one dimensional. Many people go out of their way to avoid the “Oprah Book Club” label, even if choosing the same title in a different printing.



Again, why do we attack a woman who has contributed to a significant and healthy increasing in reading in a culture to works to furiously to discourage it? When thousands of people, who would otherwise not even consider it, are reading Tolstoy and Steinbeck, we need to give credit where it is due. Certainly she also promotes books that are considered of “literary” quality, but this further reflects Oprah’s human-ness, reflecting her personal taste regardless of criticism (Besides, the snobbery in the literary world fails to acknowledge the importance of popular fiction in our culture). Consider that, demographically, most of her book club members are the main market for trashy romances.



Many of us would benefit from picking up a few of Oprah’s reading selection.

Posted by Jamie Arpin-Ricci in 06:34:44 | Permalink | Comments (17)