Friday, July 29, 2005

A Prayer Request

Over the last few months, my father (Don Ricci) has been dealing with a persistant lung cough. X-rays revealed two masses in his right lung. Tomorrow (Friday, July 29th) at 10:30am here in Winnipeg, he will go in for surgery to have them removed. While he is in surgery, they will test the growths for cancer. If it is positive, they will have to remove the whole lung on the spot.

Please keep my father and the family in prayers. Thanks a lot.

Peace,
Jamie Arpin-Ricci

Posted by Jamie Arpin-Ricci in 11:52:21 | Permalink | Comments (5)

Tuesday, July 26, 2005

The Gospel That Isn’t – by Len Hjalmarson

by Len Hjalmarson

If there is any concensus in the emergent church, it is that the gospel preached in North America is not the Gospel. Closely related, many of us believe that what we call “church” is not the church. The church exists as a quality of relationship and the transcendent intersection of Spirit and flesh in faithful communities that serve to make Christ known. It is dynamic and powerful and bears only a passing relationship to the institutions built by humankind.

A discussion on RESONATE got me thinking about the relationship of the Gospel and its expression in faithful communities. The relationship is much like that of root and fruit.

At the risk of offense, here are some thoughts. If what we see around us is congregations rather than communities.. if we see organizations which mostly limit the earthly expression of the movement Jesus died to birth… if, in other words, we see many gatherings not much “church”.. then we are witnessing the natural outcome of a gospel that is not the Gospel.

My thesis is this: the true Gospel produces what God intended – authentic and faithful communities of Jesus apprentices who are impacting their world. If what we see around us is not that.. then it is an expression of a gospel that is not the Gospel. The fruit is wrong.. therefore the root is wrong.

Within emergent circles there is concensus on few things.. but one of those few things is that we have mostly lost the real Gospel.. we have exchanged it for slick packaged, self-oriented, pottage.. we have a gospel of sin management, fire insurance, that is informational but does not transform.. it has little reference to the Gospel of the Kingdom that Jesus preached.

And therefore it shouldn’t surprise us if the product is McChurch rather than ekklesia.

Posted by Jamie Arpin-Ricci in 06:56:10 | Permalink | Comments (2)

Monday, July 18, 2005

A Study In Contrast

Recently, while hosting a couple of youth groups on their urban outreach here in Winnipeg, I had the opportunity to lead them through a day of cultural awareness & orientation in missions. My first activity with the group was to make a list with two categories: Canada and the United States of America. I started by asking them their impression of Canada. Along with the expected “maple syrup” and “beer” (a proud moment), there were also things such as “terrorist haven” and “military chickens”. Following this, I had them list their impressions of their own country, proffering such responses as: George W. Bush, democracy, One Nation Under God, and prosperity.

I then had them go through the list, cheering for characteristics they thought were positive and ignoring the ones they disliked (which usually meant booing). The results were fascinating. I realized instantly how the contrast of American & Canadian culture, even in the churches of both countries, reflected many of the difference that the emergent/postmodern Christian conversation is trying engage, such as surpassing conserative/liberal dichotomies, embracing new paradigms for intentional diversity and defining our identity beyond deconstructionist extremes.

As many of you already know, having been born in Minnesota to a Canadian family…

…I have the rare privilege of being a dual citizen. This has always allowed me to walk a path between these two nationalities, embracing them both with great respect, while maintaining a moderate amount of distance from each that allows for a different perspective. From this vantage point, I truly believe that, should we be able to move past (or through) the conflicts that separate our nations, the resulting relationship offers powerfully mutual benefits in this emergent journey.


One of the key ways we can work towards this reconciliation is to learn to understand and honour that which the other nation models well. I am not a sociologist and can only speak from my limited perspective, experience and education, however I would like to offer here a few characteristics from both countries that I believe demonstrate how this relationship is crucial and promising. I will start with observations about Canada:

  • A Mosaic People The multiculturalism of Canada is often referred to as being a cultural mosaic. The idea was developed in direct opposition to previous concepts of assimilation, such as the American concept of the melting pot. While the US concept has slowly broadened their understanding to be more multicultural, this concept is a key difference between these two nations. Cultural mosaic has a stronger emphasis on immigrant citizens maintain strong cultural and historical ties to their countries and cultures of origin. It is far more common, therefore, to here Canadian refer to their cultural identities of their origin before they refer to being Canadian. This does not reflect a lack of patriotism to Canada, but rather is one of the truest expressions of Canadian patriotism. I believe that Canadian concepts of multiculturalism offer promising models for the emergent conversation in the United States. (NOTE: We should not assume by this that Canada has been free from the colonialization and subjugation of assimilation practices and values. Canadians retains a tainted history with the First Nations people, French Canadians, Chinese immigrant, and many more)
  • Political Diversity of Christian Population While amoung Canadian Evangelicals, there is still largely a trend of adherence to Conservative politics, the partisanship within the church (generally speaking) is not as distinct or assumed within Canadian Christians. For example, though I consider my morally conservative, my political stances tend to lean far more “left”, thus leading to a more Liberal voting pattern in my recent years. I believe this relative openness within the Canadian church to allow for differing political positions (something that I believe very strongly differentiates us from American Evangelicalism) in part owes its roots to socialist democratic ideas. Because of this, I believe many Canadian Christians are well positioned to engage the emergent movement with a certain level of freedom/flexibility that many American Christians do not, another reason to be more intentional about dialoguing across the border.
  • Church in a Pluralist Society While the Canadian church has been referred to as one of the fastest declining churches in the Western world, having lost its United Nations status as a Christian nations year ago, there has been some greatly beneficial results from this process. In the past few years, due to the decline of denominationally stringent Christian churches, new congregations have been emerging that seem to be better equipped to respond and function in the pluralistic society that is emerging. Responding and adapting to some of the very factors that led to the demise of Canadian churches, many of these faith communities are thriving through a greater appreciation of the diversity within Christian traditions, more intentional embrace of multiculturalism, etc. Unlike the US, Canada as a Christian nation/subculture no longer exists, giving us a moderate “heads up” on the future of Christianity in the post-Evangelical, post-Christian world.

At the same time, Canada faces significant challenges and weakness that need to be addressed, such as establishing our national identity by what we are not (namely NOT American); cynical and subversive attitudes to leadership and great vision; general apathy- to name a few.

Conversely, the United States of America has a great deal that Canadian Christians desperately need to embrace, such as:

  • Social Justice Leaders Though it would be easy for any of us (American or Canadian) to point out where to US has failed in the areas of human rights and freedom, justice and civil liberties, we need to balance this with a fair understanding and appreciation of the how much the US has done (historically and today) in the fight for human equality and freedom. Even when its government did not get involved in such issues, American citizens often led the front in bringing awareness and change, not only in their own countries, but also throughout the world. America speaks with a loud “voice”, playing an important role in addressing injustice throughout the world. Canadian Christians need to learn to acknowledge that, despite legitimate concerns and criticism, we have a great deal to learn from our American sisters & brothers in this regard.
  • Unbeatable Spirit One of the core characteristics that has distinguished the people and the nation of the United States of America is their unquenchable drive to achieve the vision and goals they set before themselves. Circumstances, rather than hindrances to discourage, seem to further inspire these people to strive all the harder. Through this perseverance, they have accomplished some of the greatest achievements in many field, including being the most generous missions force in the world (perhaps, in history). Canadians, too frequently prone to dismiss what they perceive as “over zealous American emotionalism”, could learn to look beyond their critical (often cynical) evaluations and step out with vision bigger than their apparent means.
  • Freedom Though I was going to entitle this point “Freedom of Speech”, I felt it was more appropriate to feature the larger theme. While obviously an ideal not perfectly pursued, one cannot deny the contribution that the US has made to freedoms of all varieties. Though recently challenged in some circles, the freedom to dissent is a value that the church (in both countries) needs to learn from. The freedom to experiment and explore, to try new things. This theme of freedom is central to the Gospel, and while there may be a gap between this concept and American freedom, the difference is not (I believe) as big as we might think. While Canadians embrace and celebrate our freedom, we have not held it as universally for all people.

Conversely, as far as the US has come in its fight for equality, there is a great deal of deep healing and reconciliation that remains unfinished, especially with the African American and Native American communities. Their fierce determination, when fixed upon a goal, can become dangerously single-minded, even when committed to “bringing freedom” to others.

The emergent/postmodern journey is one that seeks a more authentic manifestation of the Church- thus requires voices from all peoples, cultures and nations. However, here in North America, the proximity and interconnection our these two nations requires specific attention. Americans would be wrong to dismiss Canada as a “small” voice, disconnected from their context, just as Canadians would be wrong to ignore or reject the US out of spite, frustration or even misplaced (though often denied) inferiority issues.

I would like to invite you, the readers- both American & Canadian- to add you voices here. Have anything add? Anything you disagree with? Let’s talk it out! All I ask is that we discuss, dialogue and even debate with grace and openness all around.

Posted by Jamie Arpin-Ricci in 23:17:17 | Permalink | Comments (4)

Friday, July 8, 2005

Our Thoughts and Prayers are with London

As the city of London reels under the harsh reality of the recent cowardly attacks on innocent people, I am left with an urgent need to pray. And yet, I do not know what to pray. I am without words.

Lord have mercy.

Christ have mercy.

Amen.

Posted by Jamie Arpin-Ricci in 10:43:32 | Permalink | Comments (2)

Monday, July 4, 2005

Honouring the American People

While I was raised by Canadian parents in Canada, I was born in the US, making me a dual citizen of both nations. For some, this would simply be a matter of paperwork, but for me it represents something important within my identity. The United States government extends to me all the rights and priveleges of a citizen, something I take very seriously.

Growing up in Canada, however, anti-American sentiment was all too common. Canadians often choose to define their identity by what they are not- namely American. With current world events, this has increased significantly. Regardless of ones position on the US, its government, culture, foreign policy, etc. (issues that do need to be addressed), the dismissive attitude of judgment is not something Canadians should be proud of, especially within the church.

No one with any objectivity can deny the incredible force for good that the American people have been, both throughout their history and today. Their unbeatable spirit, determined ingenuity and remarkable determination have made it possible for our world to be changed for the better in so many arenas. Acknowledging the inevitable human failures that all nations are prone to, the tasks of human rights, world missions, civil liberties, etc. would not be nearly where they are today without the United States.

Additionally

Additionally, the unmatched generousity and drive of the American people demonstrates an admirable willingness to “put their money where their mouths is”. Seemingly impossible circumstances never seem to diminish the monumental vision and tireless perseverance of this great nation.

So on this day of celebration, July 4th, I would like to honour the United States of America, the land of my birth. I honour them for the rich tradition of Christian service and values. I honour them for their unquenchable spirit. I honour them for championing the cause of freedom that seeks to empower even its own detractors. Thank you for your service to the world and to our God.


(NOTE: This post is dedicated to honour the United States on their Independence Day. Therefore, while I believe in open dialogue and the need to critical examination of American culture and government, this thread is NOT the place. Judgment, criticism, attacks, etc. will not be tolerated. Thank you.)

Posted by Jamie Arpin-Ricci in 12:10:28 | Permalink | Comments (10)

Saturday, July 2, 2005

Dangers Along The Journey

Recently, as I have moderated this blog and participated in others surrounding the emergent journey, I have seen a pattern develop. Before long, threads of conversation turn to argument, often not pertaining to the original post. Groups on all sides of the issue tend to have at least a couple people in their ranks who seem to thrive on the deterioration of the dialogue. It has raised a number of concerns for me.

First, I believe that the emergent journey is one that is frought with dangers. We regularly risk the twin extremes of reckless abandonment and paralysing fear. Our awareness of this reality should give birth to humility and care, rather than further polarization over reactionary emotions. Emotions are an important part of this conversation, as long as their do not rule us (anymore than we should be overly ruled by our minds or our need to action).

Second, I truly believe that the emergent journey needs the critics for it to remain true, even when those critiques are communicated inapproproately or with poor intentions, for we do not live our faith in a vaccuum. However, once again we find ourselves between the dualing tensions of open dialogue that edifies and distracting conflicts that are simply “sounding gongs”.

Finally, I am torn by the nature of what inclusivity should mean in this dialogue. Censorship can become an appealing option, but one I avoid with deep conviction, believing that all voices should be heard in the right context. However, I wonder if this blog and others like it- dedicated to the forward development and maturation of the emergent journey- are appropriate places for the dissent of those not sharing this commitment.

The questions remain for me: What is the purpose of this site? Should it function under the presupposition that those utilizing it are already more or less committed to this journey? If so, while constructive criticism and caution are welcome, should they not largely (or only) come from those with a commitment to this end?

And if not functioning under these presuppositions, then the issue becomes how to better deal with these exchanges. What I hope to see here (and else) is a greater sense of civility to one another from both sides, including a more gracious scrutiny of the words being read as well as those being written. In fact, I believe it is more important for those of us who believe this movement represents us to hold ourselves to an even higher standard.

We must also be very careful not to justify hostile or harsh retorts, sarcasm or judgment by citing Biblical examples of godly rebuke. While Jesus and the Apostles did speak correctively to others, we lack the nature of their tone and the equivelance of their context, not to mention their proven authority. Let us treat each other with the mutual humility that we all deserve.

I have still not answered all these questions, so I would appreciate all of your insights. For my part, if I have presented myself and my beliefs and ideas inappropriately or unkindly, please accept my sincerest apology. If I have, I would appreciate the opportunity to make it right.

Posted by Jamie Arpin-Ricci in 09:01:24 | Permalink | Comments (11)

Resisting the Normative Gaze -Part 2

This is the second part in a great set of postings from “Musings of an Emergent Postmodern Negro”. Click here to read Part 1. Jamie.

Resisting the “Normative Gaze” – Part 2
by postmodernegro

Alright. Some great comments from my last post on this topic. Which has led to some interesting discussion in other places. The lead off question:

Will the emerging church be able to resist the historic “normative gaze” of a particular Christian culture that assumes the normativity of European culture and theology?

Notice. I haven’t said that the emerging church has not resisted normative gaze. For me, that remains to be seen. We’ll see. But where were we?

I take my cue from the apostle Paul again:

3The world is unprincipled. It’s dog-eat-dog out there! The world doesn’t fight fair. But we don’t live or fight our battles that way–never have and never will. 4The tools of our trade aren’t for marketing or manipulation, but they are for demolishing that entire massively corrupt culture. 5We use our powerful God-tools for smashing warped philosophies, tearing down barriers erected against the truth of God, fitting every loose thought and emotion and impulse into the structure of life shaped by Christ. 6Our tools are ready at hand for clearing the ground of every obstruction and building lives of obedience into maturity. – 2 Corinthians 10 (Message)
Paul teaches us that there are philosophies, warped philosophies, and barriers erected against the truth of God. I would venture to say that there are practices along with these barriers that do indeed stand in the way of Truth. One of the practices that we are engaged in here is the practice of the normative gaze. Although referred to as an ideal by Cornel West I consider it a practice as well. For gazing requires movement and intentionality. To quote Cornel West again:

“This ideal was drawn primarily from classical aesthetic values of beauty, proportion, and human form and classical cultural standards of moderation, self-control, and harmony. The role of the classical aesthetic and cultural norms in the emergence of the idea of white supremacy as an object of modern discourse cannot be underestimated.” (West,Prophesy Deliverance, p.54)

Basically the classical aesthetic becomes the “norm” for beauty and truth. For a richer genealogy of modern racism check out West’s Reader. I am sure there are other places where this can be found. But what comes out of this is this: the tyranny of a perceived universal over a particular. Thus particularity becomes a scandal. One attempting to speak authentically from their particularity becomes a scandal. This could be do to perceived power. But as a Christian I can only see this as some kind of idolatry. In effect raising one’s ethnicity above others and holding it as the norm for others to follow suit I believe to be a form of idolatry. Jesus once told us that it was a sin to love one’s own family more than Him. Which is startling thing for Jesus to say in our culture charged with jingoism and nationalistic pride.

I wanted to write more but this is where my main thoughts have left me thus far. I have been thinking about some things Stanley Hauerwas has said on the attachments of the old age or aeon and how that is connected to violence and idolatry. For it seems that race-ism is deeply connected to an over-love for family and ethnic heritage than it is of pure hatred of another family or race. We’ll see as this journey unfolds.

Posted by Jamie Arpin-Ricci in 01:10:58 | Permalink | Comments (4)